The Case v. Montana decision replaces the Fourth Amendment’s “probable cause” requirement with “objective reasonableness” when officers believe someone is in danger.
Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. (Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images) The Supreme Court on Friday afternoon added four new cases, on topics ranging from the Fourth ...
ICE claims power to enter homes without a judge’s warrant. A former federal judge explains why that guts the Fourth Amendment and endangers everyone.
The Supreme Court’s review of United States v. Chatrie puts geofence warrants and mass digital data seizures under Fourth Amendment scrutiny, raising urgent questions about particularity, AI-driven ...
On October 15, the Supreme Court heard nearly 2.5 hours of oral argument in the Voting Rights Act Case. Without even taking a break, the Court heard the second case, fittingly titled Case v. Montana.
A pre-trial motion hearing took place regarding Buster Robbins, accused of the 1989 murder of Beverly Wivell. The defense sought to suppress digital evidence from Robbins' cell phone, arguing that the ...
Hosted on MSN
Supreme Court takes up four new cases, including disputes on geofence warrants and Roundup weedkiller
The Supreme Court on Friday afternoon added four new cases, on topics ranging from the Fourth Amendment to federal preemption, to its Oral Argument Docket for the 2025-26 term. The announcement came ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results